use the following search parameters to narrow your results: /r/technology is a place to share and discuss the latest developments, happenings and curiosities in the world of technology; a broad spectrum of conversation as to the innovations, aspirations, applications and machinations that define our age and shape our future. Google made $6.8bn in 2019, but Australia represented only $134m of that, and only like $6m of that came from Google Search. Advertising money is not FREE CASH that news media is entitled to. ", there really isnt a lot that can be changed looks wise? It still just doesn't address the fact that news outlets could opt out at any time by simply telling google not to show their links, and not tagging the information to make it share 'better' on facebook and in many cases actively posting the articles to the platform. How much of the article did they consume here? Google's absolutely not going to let themselves be forced into that sort of agreement (which selectively benefits a politically influential subset of Australian news organizations). In a nutshell, the Google Australia organization is willing to pay protection money to a Murdoch, Stokes, Costello mass-media cartel. As an Australian who now lives in the Bay Area, the Australian government think to highly of itself. Google is a private entity with a product that has many alternatives. Submissions must be primarily news and developments relating to technology. Most used maps. [–]far-que -1 points0 points1 point 3 months ago (5 children). Let me know if you are still confused and I will endeavor to clarify :), [–]wizardseven 0 points1 point2 points 3 months ago (0 children), Please don't give google a good reason to combat VPNs, and then sell it as a product to website therefore unraveling the VPN industry, Edit: I don't see it happening, but still, [–]joeypants05 3 points4 points5 points 3 months ago (4 children). The advertising dollar is not a free handout and companies like Google and FB works hard making their advertisers get real value. Probably redesign the site to not look like a mess, change the ad layout, definitely remove paywalls. Also I dont think you get just how precarious the media is in most countries. Rule violators will be warned. Clearly that hasn't happened. I presume that the internet and independent media may not survive this balls-up of a proposal. Google. [–]far-que 0 points1 point2 points 3 months ago (15 children), Let google leave. Good, f#*k off google, everyone should use DuckDuckGo instead. Throw the bums out if you don't like it. Self-post cross-posts are not acceptable. [–]triceaulor 6 points7 points8 points 3 months ago (1 child). Also, I don't know why the senators feel that they're being blackmailed. Furthermore it appeals to the ignorance of What-do-I-do before Google? yes, but what innovation would you suggest? In the world. Pretty much every news site I see looks the exact same, if its not working then change it up. Instantly the internet no longer works for an untold number of people and many would likely not know how to fix it. If Paul (Microsoft) does recommendation, he's ok until the law changes its mind. Last I heard, Australia still had elections. It's a good way to generate some tax revenue from google. Just imagine all other major entities doing this. Google has many special features to help you … Our /u/AutoModerator configuration may be viewed here. This means that this is an unfair and inequitable law. And this is exactly why google needs to be cut down. Subscribe: http://bit.ly/WeeklyYouTube Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/theweeklytv/Twitter: http://bit.ly/WeeklyTwitter A dusty corner on the internet where you can chew the fat about Australia and Australians. Yea this is a terrible video. Hows huawei maps outside of china for car navigation? If the media code passes in its current state, special exemptions would need to be granted to whatever search engine the government wants to replace Google - at that point it would be clear that the issue was always with the code itself. Sure you could argue that Reddit is not big yet, but that's not the point of the law. Media is leeching by wanting to get paid for the many hours of work put in by journalists, editors, online, marketing and other teams? It's ironic that he paint Google as this big bad multinational company while at the end is happy to use another alternative multinational company, Apple. So..... do google home devices and chrome casts and all those other things still work without google search? [–]icanucan 10 points11 points12 points 3 months ago (6 children). Of course there is even more drastic step that countries could do. Gosh??? Search the world's information, including webpages, images, videos and more. Explained: something unannounced that might not happen and noone has said it will. Businesses decide to CHOOSE Google or FB because it gives them a better return on investment than news media. [–]EdelSheep 3 points4 points5 points 3 months ago (1 child). [–]Frank_JWilson 2 points3 points4 points 3 months ago (2 children). Why should media subsidise the likes of google who are already making tonnes of money? A more simple, secure, and faster web browser than ever, with Google’s smarts built-in. Now he is a hack just like every other journo. Bloomberg paywall. thats not greed, its staving off bankruptcy. Advertising Programs Business Solutions About Google Google.com. I expect higher quality, unbiased journalism when I see the ABC logo on something :(. Australia’s proposed news media bargaining code has seen Google threaten to shut its search engine there. be free of user editorialization or alteration of meaning. I used to steal news everyday when I'd look at the multiple newspapers as I walked past the newsagent at the train station - I couldn't steal content from the fine journalists of magazines with black sealed covers. Or, it could get interesting. Access Google Drive with a free Google account (for personal use) or Google Workspace account (for business use). v) Submissions discussing the subreddit itself; they should be submitted to /r/TechnologyTalk, or messaged to the moderators of the subreddit. It's obvious they don't understand the audience, for instance, no one nowadays will pay for a paywall and there are plenty of ways to get around it, its more just alienating people away from their site. You're posting a link to a journalistic video which is displayed and rendered and view entirely within Reddit without even going to the ABC. [–]Frank_JWilson 4 points5 points6 points 3 months ago (0 children). , RemindMe! He shows us the summary at 2:24 - which is the first sentence from the wikipedia page, is wikipedia the enemy for having people summarise and link/cite journalist's work, or are google 'stealing' free work from wikipedia? Of course Google has given no indication it intends to pull out of Australia entirely, or to what extent its devices and services would be affected if it blocks Search. iv) Petitions, Surveys or Crowdfunding (Including ICOs) - submissions of this nature will be removed. They really give alot of 'free' stuff, from maps/waze to chrome/edge and so on. People don't want to touch their products because Google. If you can, I'd highly recommend skimming through the draft in question or reading a summary. People don't want to touch their products because Google seem to have developed a habit of killing off services with little notice. Sure Google gives the user a preview of the news article and some images. Worker reinstated. Removed threads will either be given a removal reason flair or comment response; please message the moderators if this did not occur. Search the world's information, including webpages, images, videos and more. I concede on that last point, google news should not be able to put their own ads on someone else's content. vi) Submissions discussing one or more incidents of customer support. While cutting off search seems like a fairly big deal it can get worse. FFS. [–]epeternally 0 points1 point2 points 3 months ago (0 children). Sure would be nice if a search engine could index those pages and present at least snippets. Most media outlets are on the bones of their arse. Google adverts are a rip off too... Youtube music is a hot mess... [–]ZaviaGenX 0 points1 point2 points 3 months ago (3 children). What are you talking about? This may be reversed upon evidence of suitable behavior. Sticking with the coffee analogy, when a friend ask you for a coffee recommendation, you are forced to tell them about all these coffee places and then are also forced to pay all these coffee places for your recommendation. Without said search engine operator the media outlets would not be getting the traffic they get now, its really the media that are being parasitic in this situation. and join one of thousands of communities. Google Images. So now we see the dangers of a search engine monopoly. And I would ask you (and him) the same questions. Can you set up a Google home to search on a search engine that's NOT Google???? And honestly, it's not going to make people read more news...half the news sites are subscribers only anyway! Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy. [–]-linear- 21 points22 points23 points 3 months ago* (9 children). iii) Requests for tech support, questions or help: submit to /r/techsupport, /r/AskTechnology, another relevant community or our weekly Support Saturday threads. They don't HAVE to be indexed and previewed by Google search and Google is perfect happy to help them remove themselves from Google search results. [–]JacobTheArbiter 0 points1 point2 points 3 months ago (0 children). We use cookies on our websites for a number of purposes, including analytics and performance, functionality and advertising. Tweets should not be used as a news source unless an official announcement by a verified company or spokesperson. You're one of very few with that opinion, buddy. A good rule of thumb is to look at the URL; if it's a video hosting site, or mentions video in the URL, it's not suitable. Google has threatened to remove its search engine from Australia over the nation's attempt to make the tech giant share royalties with news publishers. Do you know where we can read more details about this new law? ii) Images, audio or videos: Articles with supporting image and video content are allowed; if the text is only there to explain the media, then it is not suitable. The more I think about this the more I realize I need to make sure I’m not reliant on something like Google for something critical without at least a backup plan. Scientists and researches use Google. Id also be curious to know how media is Leeching? r/australia: A dusty corner on the internet where you can chew the fat about Australia and Australians. Surprised to find these comments so anti-Google. 2 months ago. Bloomberg paywall. Google has many special features to help you find exactly what you're looking for. This is the RE response. The journalists also failed to mention that this law is written specifically at particular corporations. 14. level 2. peter-doubt. Using the same example, the law forces YOU (Google, FB) and only YOU (Google, FB) to pay for coffee recommendation. Google has literally been signing multiple deals with media every week. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. This is backwards to me since their site wouldn't get nearly as much traffic without search engines like google. Google is threatening to pull its search engine from an entire country — Australia — if a proposed law goes into effect that would force Google to pay news publishers for their content. It is excellent actually, I was pleasantly surprised, [+]chappie167 comment score below threshold-7 points-6 points-5 points 3 months ago (0 children). One of the largest companies in the world, Google has an estimated value of more than US$1 trillion - or roughly two thirds of Australia… So yes, this level of journalism is bad. Only certain news organisations are entitled to payment from Google. For Google, though, Australia represents only a tiny amount of its overall revenue and profit. This isn't a hive-mind or popularity contest, ya know... [–]Louiethefly 6 points7 points8 points 3 months ago (2 children). Most used email. [–]ZaviaGenX 0 points1 point2 points 3 months ago (1 child). He wasn't threatening you mate...? maybe. Google threatened to disable its search engine in Australia if it’s forced to pay local publishers for news, a dramatic escalation of a months-long standoff with the government. It's one-sided, missing all the crucial information used to inform the audience. Probably redesign the site to not look like a mess, change the ad layout, definitely remove paywalls. They did it with our internet, where they fucked up the NBN absolutely terribly, gave tens of millions to Murdoch to fund women's sports and rural newspapers, which they did neither. [–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 3 months ago (0 children). They likely would just not search for news and updates I guess, think 2017 siri. SEO and search engine traffic is useful but it isnt a recurring audience.... besides name a corporate who isnt greedy? Journalists need to adapt to this. Since Google owns some of the best and most-used apps, websites, and internet services, making a clean break is difficult—but not impossible. Use Google Hangouts to keep in touch with one person or a group. As good as waze/gmaps? Australians in particular are accustomed to working around geo-blocking...I even recall our prime minister suggesting we "use a VPN". Google says it will disable Search in Australia if it's forced to pay for news The company's spokesperson made the statement at a … Google's absolutely not going to let themselves be forced into that sort of agreement (which selectively benefits a politically influential subset of Australian news organizations). SocietyGoogle Threatens to Remove Search in Australia as Spat Escalates (bloomberg.com), submitted 3 months ago by BettercallMyself, [–]bisnark 14 points15 points16 points 3 months ago (4 children). They know they can’t turn down A$150 million profit every year. If they're gone then something new and better will take their place. Imagine Google really wants to flex its muscles and blocks all Australian IPs from Googles public DNS. Compared to China, Australia is a much smaller potential market. Otherwise it's just arguing that people could create a shallow impression of a story because they can combine news source headlines. [–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 3 months ago* (0 children). Use Google Hangouts to keep in touch with one person or a group. In the latest controversy revolving around Google, the company is considering to completely switch off its Google search function for the Australian users. Other search engine will be targeted as well, this a problem of stupid government backing medias to bully a search engine into paying fee for helping those news sites getting traffic. Russia already reconfigured their networks so that their Internet works as an independent island that just has connections to outside world. [–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 3 months ago (3 children). No one's denying that they wield a shocking amount of power, but the Australian media code is very one-sided. One Year "Did the internet and independent media survive?". If France can stand up to them, then so should Australia. They link to stories which generates them money while the media scrapes by, even thought they've incurred nearly all off the costs of compiling the news stories.

For Sale By Owner Hamilton, Mt, Tango Originated In What Country, White Glove Service Logistics, The Big Reveal Synonym, Quand On Ne Sait Pas Synonyme, Lansdown Cheltenham Phone Number,